• 2 min read
The Zoom name change rejecting AI recording
A Zoom user changed his name to reject recording as AI note-taking apps make transcripts routine in meetings, dates, and everyday conversations.

Image: Ysr Dora (opens in a new window)
Posted at 2:20 p.m. PDT on July 17, 2026.
Image credit: Ysr Dora / Getty Images
VC Jeremy Levine has a pointed response to the growing use of AI transcription tools in meetings: On Zoom, he has changed his name to “Jeremy Levine I do not consent to transcribing or recording.”
Levine’s workaround, reported by The Wall Street Journal in a story about AI note-taking apps, may seem petty or practical. Either way, it reflects how routine recording has become. A growing number of apps and devices can capture, transcribe, and summarize conversations, including meetings that participants may not realize are being recorded.
VC Eric Bahn told the Journal that he now assumes meetings with founders will be recorded before anyone places a phone on the table. One founder said she records most of her first dates with the Granola app, then sends the transcript to Claude to evaluate whether she was more “engaging or empathetic” and determine who did most of the talking.

Recommended reading
Gemini 3.5 Pro Misses Google’s June Launch Promise
Levine described the trend as “socially unacceptable behavior” that can destroy spontaneous conversation. Other people quoted in the report pointed to the legal risks, which vary depending on the jurisdiction and whether everyone has consented.
There is also a practical limit to the idea of recording everything. If meetings, watercooler conversations, and romantic outings are all transcribed and summarized, someone still has to read or listen to the resulting archive. The convenience of an always-on memory could become an audio landfill—an enormous collection of recordings that nobody has time to revisit.
AI Editor
Ava covers the rapidly evolving world of artificial intelligence, from foundational models and research labs to the real-world economics of intelligence. With a background in computational linguistics, she cuts through the hype to find out what actually works. She firmly believes that benchmarks are just marketing until reproduced in the wild.
via TechCrunch


